Skip to main content
Fortify Labs
Enterprise Offensive Security

We beat the benchmark-maker on their own scoreboard.

100% on XBOW’s own benchmark — vs. XBOW’s published 85%. 0 compound-learning beliefs across 11 specialist agents, running continuously against your stack. Built for security teams that need more than a quarterly PDF.

Request a Scoping CallSee the brain
XBOW benchmark · black-box
Fortify Labs0%
104 / 104 solved
XBOW (published)85%
88 / 104 · their own system

We beat the benchmark-maker on their own benchmark. The gap is what compound learning buys you.

0
Compound beliefs
active · across agents
0
Specialist agents
dedicated playbooks
3h 42m
MTTR · critical
mean on live engagements
24h
Response time
scoping calls · NDA first
Operating under Fortify Labs LLC
NDA-first engagement
SOC 2 · ISO 27001 · HIPAA · PCI mapped
Incognito-verified findings
Response within 24 hours
Engagement Models

Three ways to work with us.

Every engagement runs on the same brain. What changes is cadence, scope, and what leaves the engagement on your letterhead.

For teams shipping weekly or faster

Retainer Pentest

$10K – $25K / month

Continuous autonomous testing against your production stack. New findings every week. Re-tested after every fix.

  • Weekly scans across web, API, and cloud surface
  • Every finding with live PoC + remediation playbook
  • Private Slack channel with the lead operator
  • Brain beliefs tuned to your framework and architecture
Most common
For SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / HIPAA cadence

Annual Audit

$25K – $50K

Deep, compliance-ready engagement with a signed letter of attestation. Mapped to SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and PCI.

  • Full offensive audit: web, mobile, cloud, internal
  • Authenticated multi-role testing with Playwright agents
  • Formal report, executive summary, and control mapping
  • Retest window included; attestation letter on clean rerun
For teams already breached

Incident Response

Custom scoping

Active breach support. Root-cause reconstruction, blast-radius mapping, and hardening after an intrusion.

  • Rapid engagement (24–72 hours)
  • Log forensics + reconstructing the intrusion path
  • Containment recommendations and post-incident hardening
  • Executive and board-level briefing

Not sure which fits? A 30-minute scoping call matches engagement to risk surface.

Service details
The Advantage

The only AI pentester with proven compound learning.

Most AI security tools ship prompts and scripts. We ship a system that gets measurably sharper every engagement. A proven technique on one customer feeds the next. A failed one decays out.

We published the numbers. You can query them yourself.

Inspect the brain

Compound-learning brain

Every engagement feeds back into a shared belief system. Untested theories carry low confidence; proven patterns get reinforced; dead techniques decay out. Engagement #100 is measurably sharper than engagement #1.

Benchmarked, not asserted

100% on XBOW — the industry's standard AI pentest evaluation. XBOW's own system benchmarks at 85%. Every score is backed by a query you can run against our public Supabase endpoint.

10-agent specialist swarm

Recon, access control, auth, injection, business logic, chain attack, API abuse, XSS, infrastructure, and data access — each a dedicated specialist with its own playbook, belief store, and model assignment.

Proof, not theory

Nothing leaves the engagement without a reproducible PoC. Theoretical findings stay in the draft bucket. The customer sees exploit evidence the same way an attacker would see it.

What you receive

This is one finding. You’ll get dozens.

Every item in every report looks like this. Severity, evidence, reproducible PoC, CVSS breakdown, remediation — with the same formatting your engineers can paste straight into a ticket.

Critical · 9.1CWE-639 · IDORfinding #014

Unauthenticated transaction read via guessable /api/transactions/:id

Evidence · server response
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
content-type: application/json
x-firebase-rules: public-read

{
  "id": "txn_7a93c2",
  "amount_cents": 14230000,
  "recipient": "acct_redacted",
  "status": "settled",
  "owner_uid": "u_not_requestor"
}
Reproducible PoC
copy
$ curl -s https://api.redacted.example/transactions/txn_7a93c2 \
    -H "accept: application/json"
# → 200 OK, $142,300 record returned with no auth header
CVSS 3.1 breakdown
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Remediation · Firestore rule
match /transactions/{id} {
  allow read: if request.auth != null
    && resource.data.owner_uid
       == request.auth.uid;
}
open in cursor
Belief source: idor@next-firebase · conf 0.91Surfaced by access-control agent · 3h 42m in

Illustrative · anonymized · no real customer data shown

Positioning

Where we sit in the field.

Against the four categories a CISO evaluates us alongside.

Fortify LabsConsultancyPTaaSScanner
CadenceContinuousQuarterly / annualOn-demandScheduled
Proof-of-exploitEvery finding · incognito-verifiedSometimesUsuallyRare
Compound learningYes · 465+ beliefsIn-person onlyTester-localNone
Fixed feeYes · before kickoffRarelyPer-testerPer-seat
Attestation letterYes · on clean rerunYesSometimesNo
Time-to-first-criticalHoursWeeksDaysHours (noisy)
Field Record

Selected engagements.

All case studies
Authorized fintech assessment — payout platform
Q1 2026 · undisclosed vendor

Found $19,832 in exposed payout data through a single indirect IDOR chain

A production fintech platform with standard Firebase auth and public read rules. Our recon agent mapped the exfil path; the access-control agent proved cross-user read via asymmetric Firestore rules. Finding was reproduced in an incognito browser, remediated by the customer within 48 hours, and closed under a paid engagement. The belief that led here — an indirect-IDOR pattern first surfaced from an XBOW solve months earlier — contributed to three subsequent findings on unrelated customers.

Time to first critical
3h 42m
Records reachable
$19,832 in payout data
Time to remediation
48 hours
PremiumMinds — community platform assessment
Pre-launch · signed scope

Mapped pre-launch risk items before the first paying user signed up

Full offensive audit of a production Next.js and Supabase community platform ahead of its public launch. Retainer engagement: weekly scans, direct slack-channel reporting to the founder, and continuous re-testing. Every finding was shipped with a Cursor-ready fix prompt, then re-verified on the next cycle. Specific finding counts are held under engagement confidentiality until the customer publishes their own write-up.

Engagement type
Retainer
Framework
Next.js + Supabase
Findings at launch
0 exploitable
The Family

One engine. Three go-to-markets.

Fortify Labs runs the enterprise practice. Underneath: the same compound-learning brain powers our startup and healthcare brands.

Enterpriseyou are here
Fortify Labs
fortifylabs.ai

The practice. $10K–$50K engagements, retainers, annual audits, IR. This is where boards buy.

Startups & vibe-coded apps
VibeArmor
vibearmor.ai

Self-serve scanner for founders. Letter-grade reports, copy-paste fixes. From $99/mo.

Healthcare
HIPAA Shield
hipaashield.ai

HIPAA-mapped testing and attestation for healthcare platforms. BAAs, HITRUST crosswalk.

All three brands operate under Fortify Labs LLC. Every engagement — enterprise, startup, or healthcare — contributes back to the same compound-learning brain.

Scoping calls · 30 minutes

Ready to see what we’d find in your stack?

A 30-minute scoping call maps engagement to risk surface. You leave with a sample report, a fixed fee, and a clear picture of what continuous offensive coverage looks like for your team.

Request a Scoping Call

Response within 24 hours · NDA on request